I wrote this comparison in 2020 and both builders have changed a great deal since. Here is what actually separates them now, and which one I would hand to which kind of site owner.
There is no video for this comparison, but I cover WordPress tooling and site building on the channel. Subscribe to catch new tutorials the moment they go live.
Elementor is the bigger, faster-moving builder with the deeper ecosystem, and it is what most people should reach for. Beaver Builder is the quieter, more conservative one that produces lighter markup and breaks less often, which is exactly why the agencies that use it will not leave. Both now use flexbox containers, so the structural gap that defined this comparison in 2020 is largely closed. The decision is about temperament, not features.
Reach and features, or stability and clean outputEditor's note, July 2026. This comparison was written in February 2020. Both builders are still actively developed, and I have rechecked the conclusion rather than leaving a stale one standing. The original screenshots and pricing shots have been removed: both interfaces have been redesigned since, and pricing on both sides has moved, so leaving 2020 captures in place would mislead more than it helped. Check the current pricing pages before you buy.
The single biggest change is structural. In 2020 both builders were built on rows and columns, and most of the argument was about which one nested them more gracefully. That argument is over. Elementor replaced sections with flexbox containers and has since moved to native CSS Grid containers, where you define rows and columns mathematically instead of eyeballing them. Beaver Builder got there differently, through its Box module, which brings the same flexbox layout model and cuts a lot of wrapper markup out of the page.
The practical result is that both builders now output far less HTML than they did when I first ran these tests, and the structural complaint I had about each of them in 2020 has largely been answered.
My route through website tooling was not elegant. I started writing straight HTML in Notepad, which I still do occasionally, moved to Microsoft FrontPage to generate HTML and CSS rather poorly, then to Adobe Dreamweaver which generated it slightly less poorly. Then came WordPress, and with it the realisation that there is an entire industry of themes, frameworks, page builders and plugins, and no obvious place to start. You picked something, and you stayed with it until something better turned up.
I started on Be Theme with what was then called Visual Composer. It was a decent block by block builder for its time, and I accepted that editing theme PHP files was the only real way to touch a header or an archive. After a couple of years I went looking for something better and found Beaver Builder, first released in 2014. A genuine front-end editor was a revelation, and Themer meant headers, footers, archives and 404s were finally built in the same interface as everything else. Its Advanced Custom Fields integration made dynamic content possible without writing PHP.
Elementor arrived in December 2016 and grew into a phenomenon. It pushed harder on design controls, shipped features at a pace nobody else matched, and built the ecosystem that now defines it.
Beaver Builder, and this is the one finding from 2020 that has not moved. Elementor's generated markup is still the heavier of the two: a single hero section can carry fifteen to twenty nested divs plus inline styling, and equivalent Elementor pages still benchmark roughly twenty to thirty percent heavier than Beaver Builder ones. That feeds directly into load time and Core Web Vitals.
I want to be fair about the scale of that, though. Both builders are dramatically lighter than they were in 2020 now that containers have replaced nested rows and columns, and a well-built Elementor site on decent hosting is not a slow site. The gap is real, but it is a tiebreaker rather than a disqualification, and good hosting plus sensible image handling will matter more to your scores than which of these two you picked.
Elementor moves fast and ships everything. Beaver Builder moves slowly and breaks almost nothing.
This is the part the feature tables never capture. Elementor innovates constantly: more than ninety widgets, AI features, and a steady stream of new capability. That is a real advantage when you want something specific and there is already a widget or a third-party addon for it. It is also why Elementor releases occasionally need a moment to settle before you push them to client sites.
Beaver Builder adds features at what its own users cheerfully call a snail's pace, and treats reliability as the headline feature. Updates are boring, which for an agency maintaining fifty client sites is worth more than any widget. It is a smaller ecosystem with a fiercely loyal base, and almost nobody who has standardised on it wants to move.
Neither of these is a bad choice, which is why this is a fit question rather than a ranking. Pick the column that sounds like you.
Elementor is better for most people because of its far larger ecosystem and faster feature pace. Beaver Builder is better if you maintain many client sites and value stable updates and lighter markup over new features.
Beaver Builder still produces the lighter page. Equivalent Elementor sites benchmark roughly twenty to thirty percent heavier, though both are far lighter than they were before flexbox containers replaced nested rows and columns.
Yes. Elementor replaced sections with flexbox containers and has since added native CSS Grid containers, and Beaver Builder brings the same flexbox layout model through its Box module.
Yes. It is actively maintained and still holds a small but loyal share of the market. It simply ships features far more slowly than Elementor, which its users generally consider a feature rather than a flaw.
Not cleanly. Each builder stores its layouts in its own format, so moving a site means rebuilding the pages. Choose deliberately at the start of a project rather than planning to migrate later.
Six years on I would give the same answer I gave in 2020, for slightly different reasons. Most people should use Elementor, because the ecosystem and the pace of development genuinely do make hard things easy. If you are running an agency, or you care more about a page that stays fixed than a page that gains features, Beaver Builder still earns its keep.
What I would not do is agonise over it. The gap between these two has narrowed considerably since I first wrote this, and the site you build carefully in the builder you know well will beat the site you build hesitantly in the one a comparison article told you was marginally better.
Disclosure: The Elementor link below is an affiliate link, and the Beaver Builder link is a plain one, so treat the recommendation above on its merits rather than on which link pays. This post also contains affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. CK Tech Check is 100% ad-free: no banner ads, no ad tracking. Affiliate links like these and my YouTube channel are what keep the site running.